UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2014

Commission file number 0-11254

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.                            Yes   X             No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

                                                                                                Yes    X             No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

                                                                                               Yes ____         No   X    

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

On September 1, 2014, the registrant had outstanding 216,842,190 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, which is the registrant’s only class of common stock.       

ITUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(1) Pro forma explanation:

On August 29, 2014, the Company (as defined below) terminated its business relationship with Videocon Industries Limited and its affiliates (collectively “Videocon”). The unaudited pro forma balance sheet as of July 31, 2014 gives effect to the termination, including the cancellation of loans receivable and payable of $5,000,000 and the exchange of 1,495,845 global depository receipts formerly held by the Company and 20,000,000 shares of ITUS Corporation common stock formerly held by Videocon, as if all such transactions were effected on on July 31, 2014.  The Company thereupon recorded the retirement of the 20,000,000 shares of its common stock.

On September 9, 2014, the Company and the holder of a $3,500,000 Convertible Debenture due November 2016 agreed to a transaction resulting in the conversion of the principal and accrued interest of the Convertible Debenture into 18,498,943 shares of the Company’s common stock, and the conversion of 15,978,943 shares of common stock into 3,500 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.  In addition, a warrant to purchase 9,249,472 shares of common stock, initially issued with the Convertible Debenture and with an exercise price of $0.3784 per share, was exchanged for a new warrant with an exercise price of $0.31 per share and with substantially the same terms and exercisable for the same number of shares.  The unaudited pro forma balance sheet as of July 31, 2014 shows a positive adjustment to shareholder’s equity of approximately $3,807,000, giving effect to the conversion of the Convertible Debenture, the extinguishment of the related accrued interest and derivative liability, in exchange for the issuance of shares of common stock and shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, as if all such transactions were effected on on July 31, 2014.

See Note 2, Subsequent Events – for additional information regarding these subsequent events.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

ITUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2014 (UNAUDITED)

ITUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

7

ITUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(UNAUDITED)

1.         BUSINESS AND FUNDING 

Description of Business

As used herein, “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company”, or “ITUS” means ITUS Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated.  The primary operations of the Company involve the development, acquisition, licensing, and enforcement of patented technologies that are either owned or controlled by the Company.  In June 2014, ITUS Patent Acquisition Corporation acquired the exclusive rights to license and enforce our 10^th patent portfolio called Enhanced Auction Technologies, which covers enhanced presentation and cross selling technologies used by some of the world’s leading auction sites. The Company currently owns or controls 10 patent portfolios including Encrypted Mobile Communication; Enhanced Auction Technologies: ePaper® Electrophoretic Display; Internet Telephonic Gateway; J-Channel Window Frame Construction; Key Based Web Conferencing Encryption; Loyalty Conversion Systems; Micro Electro Mechanical Systems Display; Nano Field Emission Display; and VPN Multicast Communications.

As part of our patent assertion activities and in the ordinary course of our business, the Company has initiated and will likely continue to initiate patent infringement lawsuits, and engage in patent infringement litigation.  In September of 2014, the Company initiated its seventh patent assertion campaign, bringing the total number of lawsuits since we implemented our patent monetization business model in January of 2013 to 44.

 Our primary source of revenue will come from licenses resulting from the unauthorized use of our patented technologies, including the settlement of patent infringement lawsuits. During the nine months ended July 31, 2014, we entered into 5 license and/or settlement agreements including agreements in connection with our patented Key Based Web Encryption technology and our patented J-Channel Window Frame Construction technology. In September 2014, we entered into 5 additional license and/or settlement agreements with Jeld-Wen, Inc., Atrium Windows and Doors, Inc., Pella Corporation, Ply Gem Industries, Inc. and Simonton Building Products, Inc., all in connection with our patented J-Channel Window Frame Construction technology. These licenses resolved lawsuits that were pending against the aforementioned companies. Since implementing our new business model in January of 2013, the Company has entered into a total of 14 revenue producing license and/or settlement agreements, and 3 of our 7 patent assertion campaigns have now generated revenue.  

On August 29, 2014, the Company ended its relationship with Videocon Industries Limited, terminating Videocon’s license to the Company’s patented Nano Field Emission Display technology.  On September 3, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas invalidated two of our Loyalty Conversion Systems patents by ruling that they did not cover patentable subject matter, resulting in the dismissal of 7 of our Loyalty Conversion Systems Corporation’s lawsuits.  On September 8, 2014, the Company filed patent infringement lawsuits against Ebay, Vendio, and Auctiva in connection with our patented Enhanced Auction Technologies. The Company currently has 27 pending lawsuits in connection with its patented technologies.

 In addition to continuing to mine and monetize our existing patents, our wholly owned subsidiary, ITUS Patent Acquisition Corporation, will continue to acquire patents and the exclusive rights to license and enforce patents from third parties.  When necessary, we will assist such parties in the further development of their patent portfolios through the filing of additional patent applications.

Due to arrangements previously entered into by the Company, certain of our patents contain encumbrances which may negatively impact our patent monetization and patent assertion activities.  Where we are able, we will take the steps necessary to remove any encumbrances that may inhibit our patent monetization and patent assertion activities. 

Name Change

On September 2, 2014, the Company changed its name to ITUS Corporation.  The Name Change was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on May 28, 2014 and was subsequently approved by the Company’s stockholders at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on August 8, 2014.   In Greek mythology, ITUS was the God of Protection. The Name Change better aligns the Company’s corporate name with its current business and mission to develop, acquire, license and enforce of patented technologies that are either owned or controlled by the Company or one of its wholly owned subsidiaries.

Funding and Management’s Plans

In January 2013, we received aggregate gross proceeds of $1,765,000 from the issuance of 8% convertible debentures due January 25, 2015 in a private placement.  During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, $325,000 of the principal amount of these debentures were converted into 2,166,775 shares of our common stock.  During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, $1,240,000 of the principal amount of the convertible debentures were converted into 8,267,080 of shares of our common stock, and the remaining $200,000 of convertible debt was repaid in cash.

In November 2013, the Company completed a private placement with a single institutional investor, pursuant to which the Company issued a $3,500,000 principal amount 6% convertible debenture due November 11, 2016.  For details of this debenture, please see Note 3, Convertible Debentures herein.

In July 2014, the Company completed the sale of 16,000,000 shares of its common stock at the offering price of $0.25 per share. The net proceeds from this sale totaled approximately $3,673,000.  See Note 4, Sale of Common Stock – for additional information regarding this transaction.

Revenue Recognition  

Revenue is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) all obligations have been substantially performed pursuant to the terms of the arrangement, (iii) amounts are fixed or determinable, and (iv) the collectability of amounts is reasonably assured.

Patent Monetization and Patent Assertion

In general, revenue arrangements provide for the payment of contractually determined fees in consideration for the grant of certain intellectual property rights for patented technologies owned or controlled by our operating subsidiaries.  These rights typically include some combination of the following:  (i) the grant of a non-exclusive, retroactive and future license to manufacture and/or sell products covered by patented technologies owned or controlled by our operating subsidiaries, (ii) a covenant-not-to-sue, (iii) the release of the licensee from certain claims, and (iv) the dismissal of any pending litigation.  The intellectual property rights granted are perpetual in nature, extending until the expiration of the related patents.  Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, our operating subsidiaries have no further obligation with respect to the grant of the non-exclusive retroactive and future licenses, covenants-not-to-sue, releases, and other deliverables, including no express or implied obligation on our operating subsidiaries’ part to maintain or upgrade the technology, or provide future support or services.  Generally, the agreements provide for the grant of the licenses, covenants-not-to-sue, releases, and other significant deliverables upon execution of the agreement.  As such, the earnings process is complete and revenue is recognized upon the execution of the agreement, when collectability is reasonably assured, and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Display Technology Development and License Fees

We have assessed the revenue guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-25 “Multiple-Element Arrangements” (“ASC 605-25”) to determine whether multiple deliverables in our arrangements with AUO represent separate units of accounting.  Under the AUO License Agreements, we received initial development and license fees of $3 million, of aggregate development and license fees of up to $10 million.  The additional $7 million in development and license fees were to be payable upon completion of certain conditions for the respective technologies.  We have determined that the transfer of the licensed patents and technology and the effort involved in completion of the conditions for the respective technologies represent a single unit of accounting for each technology.  Accordingly, using a proportional performance method, during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 we began recognizing the $3 million initial development and license fees over the estimated periods that we expected to complete the conditions for the respective technologies. We have not recognized any portion of the $7 million of additional development and license fees as either deferred revenue or revenue as it is considered contingent revenue.  Each of the license agreements with AUO also provide for the basis for royalty payments on future production, if any, by AUO to CopyTele, which we have determined represent separate units of accounting.  We have not recognized any royalty income under the AUO License Agreements.

At each reporting period we assess our remaining performance obligations under the AUO License agreements and recognize display technology development and license fee revenue over the remaining estimated period that we expect to complete the conditions for the respective technologies.  Development and license fee payments received from AUO which are in excess of the amounts recognized as revenue (approximately $1,187,000 as of October 31, 2013) are recorded as non-refundable deferred revenue on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. As a result of the AUO/E Ink Lawsuit described below we have not recorded any display technology development and license fee revenue during the period from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 through the second quarter of this fiscal year due to uncertainty as to our remaining performance obligations, if any. Based on our assessment for the three month period ended July 31, 2014, we have determined that we have no further performance obligations under the AUO License Agreements and accordingly we have recognized display technology development and license fee revenue of approximately $1,187,000, representing the balance of the initial $3 million payment received from AUO.

Patents

Our only identifiable intangible assets are patents and patent rights.  We capitalize patent and patent rights acquisition costs and amortize the cost over the estimated economic useful life.  Patent acquisition costs capitalized during the nine months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013, was approximately $3,036,000 and $-0-, respectively, and none during the three months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We recorded patent amortization expense of approximately $233,000 and $-0- during the nine months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and approximately $81,000 and $-0- during the three months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

2.         SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Unwinding of Business Relationship and Interests with Videocon

On August 29, 2014, the Company and CopyTele International Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Subsidiary”), terminated their business relationship (the “Business Relationship”) with Videocon Industries Limited (“Videocon”) and Mars Overseas Limited, an affiliate of Videocon (“Mars” and together with the Company, the Subsidiary and Videocon, the “Parties”).  The Business Relationship began in November 2007 and related to a proposed joint development effort between the Company and Videocon to develop a certain Nano Field Emission Display technology (the “Technology”). In connection with the proposed joint venture, (i) the Company granted a non-transferable, worldwide license to Videocon for the Technology (the “License”), (ii) the Subsidiary made a $5 million dollar loan to Mars (the “Subsidiary Loan”), (iii) Mars made an identical $5 million dollar loan to the Subsidiary (the “Mars Loan” and together with the Subsidiary Loan, the “Loans”), (iv) the Company sold to Mars 20 million shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) and (v) Global EPC Ventures Limited sold to the Company 1,495,845 global depository receipts of Videocon (the “GDRs”). The Shares and GDRs were subsequently used to secure the Loans.

Because Videocon was unable to continue with its joint development responsibilities, the Technology was not jointly developed by the Parties, and Videocon introduced the Company to AU Optronics Corp. to jointly develop the Technology with the Company. Because the Company entered into a separate agreement with AU Optronics Corp. to jointly develop the Technology, the Business Relationship with Videocon became immaterial to the Company. Accordingly, the Company and Videocon agreed to terminate the Business Relationship. In order to terminate the Business Relationship, the Parties entered into several agreements whereby: (i) the License was terminated, (ii) both of the Loans were canceled and (iii) the Shares and GDRs were exchanged for each other (collectively, the “Termination Transactions”). The result of these Termination Transactions was to undo the initial transactions between the Parties that set forth the Business Relationship. Aside from this business relationship there is no other material relationship between the Parties.  In accounting for the unwinding of this business relationship, the Company offset the two loans and then recorded its repurchased shares of common stock at the then current fair value of the GDRs and then retired and cancelled those shares.

Preferred Stock

On September 9, 2014, the Company designated 3,500 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $100 per share, in accordance with the Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on September 9, 2014 (the “Series A Convertible Preferred Stock”).  On September 9, 2014, 3,500 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were issued in connection with the conversion of the Convertible Debenture due November 2016, as discussed further, below.

Ranking            

The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock ranks senior to the Company’s common stock, to all series of any other classes of equity which may be issued and to any indebtedness, unless the Company has obtained the prior written consent of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock holder.

Optional Conversion

Holders of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock may at any time convert their shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock into such number of shares of the Company’s common stock in such an amount equal to (a) the stated value (initially $1,000) of the shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock being converted (the “Stated Value”), divided by the conversion price (initially $0.1892) ( the “Series A Conversion Price”), multiplied by (b) the number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock being converted.  In the event the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is converted in part, the Company shall deliver a new certificate of like tenor in the amount equal to the remaining balance of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock after giving effect to such partial conversion.

The holder shall not have the right to convert any portion of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock if after giving effect to such conversion, the holder, together with any affiliate thereof, would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such conversion.

The embedded conversion option has certain anti-dilution protection provisions which would be triggered if the Company issues its common stock, or certain common stock equivalents, (as defined) at a price below $0.142 per share.  

 Mandatory Conversion

At any time after November 11, 2016, if and only if the average of the high and low trading prices of the Company’s common stock for any 10 out of 20 consecutive trading days (the “Measurement Period,”) exceeds the then Series A Conversion Price, as adjusted, the Company may convert any then outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of common stock (a “Mandatory Conversion”), provided, however, that any such Mandatory Conversion shall not require a holder to convert a number of shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock into an amount of Common Stock that would exceed 50% of the daily average trading volume of the common stock during the Measurement Period. Following November 11, 2016 and subject to the price and volume limitations set forth above, the Company may require such number of successive Mandatory Conversions as are necessary to convert all then outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

Redemption

At any time on or after November 11, 2016 (the “Redemption Date”), and upon at least 60 days prior written notice to the Company (a “Redemption Notice”), any holder of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock shall have a one-time right to require the Company to redeem all or some of its shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (a “Redemption”), for cash generated from a subsequent sale of the Company’s equity securities.   The redemption price shall be equal to the Stated Value for each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Redemption Purchase Price”).  Upon receipt of a Redemption Notice, the Company shall complete a sale or sales of its equity securities for the purpose of accumulating net proceeds sufficient to pay the Redemption Purchase Price (it being understood by the holder of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that the Company may only redeem shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with the proceeds from the sale of the Company’s equity securities).

Board and Observer Rights

Each holder of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock shall have the right, upon 10 days' prior written notice, to designate one representative, reasonably acceptable to the Company, who shall be entitled to attend and observe meetings of the Company’s Board of Directors in a non-voting observer capacity (the “Observer”).

Accounting for the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

The Company determined that the economic characteristics and risks of the conversion feature and the preferred stock instrument were clearly and closely related as equity instruments and accordingly, the conversion feature would not require separate accounting.   In addition, the redemption feature is contingent upon Series A Convertible Preferred Stock not being converted into common stock and upon the holders delivering a redemption notice to the Company. Further, the redemption purchase price may only be paid from the proceeds of a subsequent sale of equity securities. Accordingly, the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock was accounted for as an equity instrument.

Conversion of the Convertible Debenture due November 2016

On September 9, 2014, holders of $3,500,000 and approximately $173,000 of principal and interest, respectively, of the Convertible Debenture due November 2016, converted their holdings into an aggregate of 18,498,943 shares of common stock the (“Conversion Common Stock”).   In addition, the Company exchanged and reissued the warrant for the purchase of 9,249,472 shares of common stock, and upon the reissuance, lowered the exercise price to $0.31 per share.   There was no change to the term of the warrant. 

In connection with this conversion, the Company recorded a loss on conversion/exchange of approximately $1,580,000, as summarized below. This loss represents the excess of the fair value of common stock issued on the date of the conversion over the net book value of the debt on the date of conversion. Since the conversion feature on the Convertible Debenture due November 2016 was determined to be a derivative liability, the net book value includes the value of the debt, net of discount, the derivative liability related to the conversion feature (after being marked to market on the conversion date, and the change in the fair value of the warrant on the date of the conversion.

The loss on extinguishment of debt was determined as follows:

On September 9, 2014, the Convertible Debenture due November 2016 was extinguished in full.  However, the Company needed to determine the fair value of the derivative liability for the embedded conversion feature immediately prior to the conversion, in order to determine the change in the fair value of the derivative for the period. The Company determined to measure the derivative immediately prior to the conversion at its intrinsic value, since this method most fairly measured the value of the derivative liability. The intrinsic value computation is provided below.  

Immediately after the conversion, the holders exchanged 15,978,943 shares of the Conversion Common Stock into 3,500 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Shortly thereafter, the Company retired and cancelled the 15,978,943 shares of common stock received in the exchange.

3.         CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES

Convertible Debenture due January 2015

In January 2013, the Company received aggregate gross proceeds of $1,765,000 from the issuance of 8% convertible debentures due January 25, 2015 (“Convertible Debenture due January 2015”), of which $250,000 was received from our current President, Chief Executive Officer and director, and two other directors of the Company. The debentures paid interest quarterly and were convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.15 per share on or before January 25, 2015. The embedded conversion feature had certain weighted average anti-dilution protection provisions which would be triggered if the Company issues its common stock, or certain common stock equivalents, (as defined) at a price below $0.15 per share.  The Company had the option to pay any interest on the debentures in common stock based on the average of the closing prices of  our common stock for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the interest payment date. The Company also had the option to pay any interest on the debentures with additional debentures.  The Company had the right to prepay the debentures at any time without penalty upon 30 days prior notice but only if the sales price of the common stock is at least $.30 for 20 trading days in any 30-day trading period ending no more than 15 days before the Company’s prepayment notice.  In conjunction with the issuance of the debentures, the Company issued warrants (the “Convertible Debenture Warrant”) to purchase 5,882,745 shares of its common stock.  Each warrant grants the holder the right to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at the purchase price of $0.30 per share on or before January 25, 2016. The Convertible Debenture Warrant may be exercised on a cashless basis only if there is not an effective registration statement covering such shares.

The Company determined, based upon authoritative guidance, that the conversion feature embedded within the Convertible Debenture due January 2015 should be valued separately and bifurcated from the host instrument and accounted for as a free-standing derivative liability and that the Convertible Debenture Warrant should also be valued and accounted for separately as an equity instrument. 

The derivative liability related to the embedded conversion feature was revalued at each reporting period as well as on the date of all conversions.  The value of the derivative liability associated with the conversions and repayments of the Convertible Debenture due January 2015 during the three months ended April 30, 2014 was approximately $1,671,000. As of April 30, 2014, the Company determined the fair value of the derivative liability to be $-0-, as the full value of the Convertible Debenture due January 2015 was converted and/or repaid in full during the three months ended April 30, 2014.  Accordingly, during the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014, the Company recorded losses on the change in fair value of the derivative liability of approximately $-0- and $1,131,000, respectively.

During the three months ended April 30, 2014, holders of $1,240,000 and approximately $9,000 of principal and interest, respectively, of the Convertible Debenture due January 2015, converted their holdings into an aggregate of 8,267,080 and 29,633 shares of common stock and holders of $200,000 of principal of the Convertible Debenture due January 2015 consented to prepayment (without conversion) of obligations to them under the instrument’s prepayment provisions. In connection with these conversions and prepayments the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $483,000 during the three months ended April 30, 2014. This loss represents the excess of the fair value of Common Stock issued and cash paid on the date of the respective conversions and prepayments over net book value of the debt on the date of conversion and/or repayment. Since the conversion feature on the Convertible Debenture due January 25, 2015 was determined to be a derivative liability, the net book value includes both the value of the debt, net of discount and the portion of derivative liability related to the conversion feature.

The loss on extinguishment of debt was calculated as follows:

 As of April 30, 2014, the Convertible Debenture due January 2015 was extinguished in full.  However, the Company needed to determine the fair value of the derivative liability for the embedded conversion feature immediately prior to the conversion, in order to determine the change in the fair value of the derivative for the period. The Company determined to measure the derivative immediately prior to the conversion at its intrinsic value, since this method most fairly measured the value of the derivative liability. The intrinsic value computation is provided below.  

  The amortization of debt discount related to the Convertible Debenture due January 2015 was approximately $-0- and $233,000 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014, respectively, and approximately $92,000 and $175,000 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013, respectively.

Convertible Debenture due November 2016  

 In November 2013, the Company received aggregate gross proceeds of $3,500,000 from the issuance of 6% convertible debentures due November 11, 2016 (“Convertible Debenture due November 2016”). The debentures pay interest annually and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.1892 per share on or before November 11, 2016.  The embedded conversion feature has certain weighted average anti-dilution protection provisions which would be triggered if the Company issues its common stock, or certain common stock equivalents, (as defined) at a price below $0.142 per share.  The Company has the option to pay any interest on the debentures in common stock based on 90% of the volume weighted average closing sales price of our common stock for the 30 trading days immediately preceding the interest payment date.  In conjunction with the issuance of the debentures, the Company issued warrants (the “Convertible Debenture Warrant”) to purchase 9,249,472 shares of its common stock.  Each warrant grants the holder the right to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at a fixed purchase price of $0.3784 per share on or before November 11, 2016.  The Convertible Debenture Warrant may be exercised on a cashless basis only if there is not an effective registration statement covering such shares.

Fair Value Determination 

We use the Black-Scholes pricing model in estimating the fair value of stock options which vest over a specific period of time or upon achieving performance targets.  To determine the weighted average fair value of stock options on the date of grant, employees and directors are included in a single group.  The fair value of stock options granted to consultants is determined on an individual basis.  The stock options we granted during the nine months ended July 31, 2014 consisted of awards with 10-year terms that vest over one year, options with 10-year terms that vest over 36 months, options with 5-year terms which vest immediately and options with 10-year terms which vest upon achievement of performance milestones.  The stock options we granted during the nine months ended July 31, 2013 consisted of awards of options with 5-year terms, which vest over one year and options with 10-year terms which vest in three annual installments commencing on the date of grant or over a nine month period. 

The following weighted average assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of stock options granted during the nine months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013, and the three months ended July 31, 2014. No stock options were granted during the three months ended July 31, 2013.

The expected term of stock options represents the weighted average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. We use the simplified method to determine expected term. The simplified method was adopted since we do not believe that historical experience is representative of future performance because of the impact of the changes in our operations and the change in terms from historical options which vested immediately to terms including vesting periods of up to three years. Under the Black-Scholes pricing model we estimated the expected volatility of our shares of common stock based upon the historical volatility of our share price over a period of time equal to the expected term of the options.  We estimated the risk-free interest rate based on the implied yield available on the applicable grant date of a U.S. Treasury note with a term equal to the expected term of the underlying grants. We made the dividend yield assumption based on our history of not paying dividends and our expectation not to pay dividends in the future.

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding under the 2010 Share Plan as of July 31, 2014:

In addition to options granted under the 2003 Share Plan and the 2010 Share Plan, in September 2012, the Board of Directors approved the grant of stock options to purchase 41,500,000 shares and, during the year ended October 31, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the grant of stock options to purchase 3,000,000 shares.

Of the stock options granted in September 2012, nonqualified options to purchase 40,000,000 shares were issued to our new executive team, consisting of 16,000,000 stock options issued to our new President and Chief Executive Officer, 8,000,000 stock options issued to our new Senior Vice President of Engineering and 16,000,000 stock options issued to a new strategic advisor to the Company who is also a Director.  These stock options have an exercise price of $0.2175 (the average of the high and the low sales price of the common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the approval of such options by the Board of Directors) and have a term of ten years.  Half of these stock options vest in 36 equal monthly installments commencing on October 31, 2012, provided that if the grantees are terminated by the Company without cause, an additional 12 months of vesting will be accelerated and such accelerated options will become immediately exercisable.  The balance of the stock options will vest in three equal installments upon achievement of a cash milestone, which was satisfied in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, and two stock price targets, which were not achieved in fiscal 2013.  In November 2013, in light of the cost and expense of revaluing the unvested portion of the performance-based stock options on a quarterly basis for financial reporting purposes, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the performance-based stock options awarded on September 19, 2012 to the President and Chief Executive Officer, Senior Vice President of Engineering and the strategic advisor. The amendment modifies the option award’s vesting conditions to provide that the unvested portion of the stock options vest in 23 consecutive monthly installments commencing November 30, 2013.  The fair value of these options was recalculated to reflect the change to service based options as of November 8, 2013 and the unrecognized compensation amount was adjusted to reflect the increase in fair value.  As of July 31, 2014, the outstanding options to purchase 40,000,000 shares had an intrinsic value of $1,660,000.  As of July 31, 2014, 24,106,280 of these stock options were exercisable with an aggregate intrinsic value of approximately $1,000,000.  These stock options otherwise have the same terms and conditions as options granted under the Company’s 2010 Share Incentive Plan. 

The remaining nonqualified  stock options granted in September 2012 to purchase 1,500,000 shares consisted of grants of 750,000 stock options to our Chairman in compensation for his service as interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as compensation for his prior service as a director, and 750,000 stock options to a director in compensation for his service in recruiting the Company’s new management team.  These stock options have an exercise price of $0.2225 (the average of the high and low sales price on September 21, 2012) and an intrinsic value as of July 31, 2014 of approximately $55,000.  The options vest in 3 equal annual installments of 250,000 commencing on September 21, 2012 and have a term of ten years.   As of July 31, 2014, 1,000,000 options were exercisable with an aggregate intrinsic value of approximately $37,000.  These stock options otherwise have the same terms and conditions as options granted under the Company’s 2010 Share Incentive Plan. 

During the year ended October 31, 2013, nonqualified stock options to purchase 3,000,000 shares were granted to our outside directors for service rendered to our Company.  Of these options,

(a)  In November 2012, nonqualified stock options to purchase 1,000,000 shares were issued to one of our directors as additional compensation for service in recruiting the Company’s new management team. These options have an exercise price of $0.211 (the average of the high and low sales price on date of grant) and vest 333,334 shares upon grant and 333,333 shares in two annual installments commencing November 30, 2013. 

(b) In February 2013, nonqualified stock options to purchase 1,000,000 shares were issued to the Chairman of the Board.  These stock options have an exercise price of $0.235 (the average of the high and low sales price on date of grant) and vest 333,334 shares upon grant and 333,333 shares in two annual installments commencing February 15, 2014. 

(c) In March 2013, nonqualified stock options to purchase an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares were granted to the Company’s three outside directors.  Each of these stock options has an exercise price of $0.195 (the average of the high and low sales price on date of grant) and vest in four equal quarterly installments commencing March 31, 2013.

As of July 31, 2014, the options to purchase 3,000,000 shares had an intrinsic value of approximately $136,000 and the portion exercisable of 2,333,334 shares had an intrinsic value of approximately $112,000.  These options otherwise have the same terms and conditions as options granted under the Company’s 2010 Share Incentive Plan.

The following table summarizes information about the above stock options outstanding that were not granted under the 2003 Share Plan or the 2010 Share Plan as of July 31, 2014:

Stock Awards

We account for stock awards granted to employees and consultants based on their grant date fair value, in accordance with ASC 718 and ASC 505-50, respectively.  During the nine months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013, we issued 130,000 shares and 665,000 shares, respectively, of common stock to consultants for services rendered pursuant to the 2010 Share Plan.  We recorded consulting expense for the nine months ended July 31 2014 and 2013 of approximately $41,000 and $168,000, respectively and for the three months ended July 31, 2014 of approximately $6,000 and $117,000, respectively, for the shares of common stock issued to consultants. 

6.         FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  In accordance with ASC 820, we have categorized our financial assets, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy as set forth below.  If the inputs used to measure the financial instruments fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

Financial assets and liabilities recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets are categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:

Level 1 - Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market which we have the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 - Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted market prices in markets where trading occurs infrequently or whose values are based on quoted prices of instruments with similar attributes in active markets.  

Level 3 – Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset and liabilities. We do not currently have any Level 3 financial assets.

The following table presents the hierarchy for our financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 31, 2014:

The following table presents the hierarchy for our financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 31, 2013: